Sneak peek of what’s coming in Windows Live Movie Maker

Movie Maker Last month, the Windows Live Movie Maker team made a blog post with a status update on what’s been happening to Movie Maker. To give you a recap, in the post Mike Torres offered some glimpses of what to expect from the new version, including more rich-editing capabilities (more transitions, trim, split, multiple soundtracks), “some sort of a timeline”, and a simple interface that would “allow more experienced people to go deeper when they need to”.

Today I was fortunate enough to catch a glimpse of the new version. The first thing I’ve noticed is a more comprehensive ribbon menu with much more functionalities compared to the version we’ve been seeing since December last year. First things first, here’s a screenshot of the newly updated Movie Maker:

Windows Live Movie Maker

We can see that the ability to add titles, captions and credits is back. New options such as image/video rotation are also available. One noticeable button is “AutoMovie” – which will automatically “add titles, credits, transitions, and effects, and fits it all together for you.” Here’s a clearer view of the ribbon:

AutoMovie 

Many people were disappointed about the lack of a “timeline” in the new Movie Maker. Although as Mike stated that the timeline might not make a return, he promised that there will be something that resembles a timeline. While we’re not sure what the “View” menu will do, here’s a preview of the new “storyboard”-like view now showing you the positions of titles and soundtracks:

Editing 

As seen above, Movie Maker also now take advantage of the new ribbon interface with the “Video Tools” and “Music Tools” tabs only appearing when you’re selecting a video or audio section of your movie. Trimming and other editing tools will be available on these tabs which will allow you to edit that section of the movie. In addition, as promised by Mike, dozens of new animations, transitions and visual effects will also be available:

Animations and Transitions

Finally, as Soapbox on MSN Video is due to be shut down by the end of this month, Windows Live Movie Maker now supports direct upload to YouTube instead, built-in right out-of-the-box:

YouTube upload

It does seem like the Microsoft have added tons of improvements to Movie Maker, however, we’ll still have to wait to see whether the “timeline” view will make a come back or not. Of course, do bear in mind that the screenshots and features discussed here are still in the works, and things might still change before v1 ships. So stay tuned at LiveSide for the latest updates!

Comments

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/nightryder21/default.aspx nightryder21

    When can we expect this to come out? I am actually using the Vista Movie Maker in my Windows 7 computer. I would really like to this this come through for me.

  • http://yertblog.blogspot.com yertthedestroyer

    My big hope is the blue title screen that I see on half of the videos on YouTube goes away now. It is almost as annoying as music loops from GarageBand.

  • JohnCz

    I hope there is a built-in facility for uploading video to SkyDrive.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/paperlock/default.aspx paperlock

    Will skydrive have folder two store videos.That will work with the windows live movie maker.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/quikboy/default.aspx quikboy

    They should add a timeline. It could be in its own separate tab on the ribbon OR it could be in a collapsible pane at the bottom and you could hide it temporarily or if you don’t feel like using it. That simple. Just make the timeline more friendlier and easier to use is all.

    It would be neat if there were thumbnail previews, just like in Bing Video. It also wouldn’t hurt to support more fonts, like the ones already available on your computer.

    I don’t want just YouTube support either. I prefer other sites like Vimeo, Viddler, Dailymotion, Brightcove, Revver, etc. It would be even great if you can upload it straight to your SkyDrive to share with friends.

    I’m not looking for WLMM to become as advanced as other professional movie editors, but it would be nice to have a decent free easy-to-use movie editor available on Windows, compared to iMovie that currently comes with all new Macs.

    I’d like to see WLMM and the other Windows Live Suite apps to be advanced enough to an extent where simple users, as well as tech savvy users can make great videos. Too much simplification is bad.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/Alber1690/default.aspx Alber1690

    I’m hoping that the “simple interface” that would “allow more experienced people to go deeper when they need to” is something that makes it into the final version, because I can’t even imagine myself working with videos at a high level of accuracy with a simple story-board view. It shouldn’t even be a question; eventhough half of the videos on YouTube seem to have been compiled with Movie Maker’s current storyboard video, a remaining 1/4 sure used the “timeline” view. But overall, thanks for the scoop, as it raises these important questions and expectations, especially after having Movie Maker removed from Windows 7.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/someone/default.aspx anonymous

    AutoMovie is nothing new, it’s there in WMM since ages. Does Microsoft expect me to use it if the Vista version works well on Windows 7 and has greater functionality? Does it even have a choice of export formats besides WMV and maybe H.264 which Microsoft have started supported recently because they have no choice but to support the increasingly popular standard? Like IE, WLMM will be adhering again to the lowest common denominator, every video editing app mentioned in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_editing_software including even freeware and open source ones have more functionality. Windows Movie Maker (the Vista version which was DirectX-based) was pretty good, save for the lack of export formats besides WMV and obvious lack of control over export settings. What is Microsoft’s problem in putting back a timeline AND a storyboard as it was? I am ready to pay for a decent app like iMovie which is not oriented only towards web video like YouTube and would avoid Movie Maker any day even if it is free. It wasn’t even that WMM was very full-featured and now we’re getting less than half of WMM’s functionality in WLMM? Currently I use an app caled MPEG Video Wizard DVD that handles ALL formats (MOV, MP4, H.264, MPEG-4 ASP, FLV, MPEG1/2) and does frame accurate editing, conversion, trimming, effects, transitions, DVD authoring and unlike most commercial video editors, is very easy to use and extremely light on resources.

  • damaster

    @quikboy: Great suggestions! But for YouTube support, keep in mind that WLMM will support plug-ins for uploading to all other online video services you’ve mentioned – I’m sure there will be a plugin created in time.

    @someone: I haven’t used iMovie before, I’m just curious to know whether there is a timeline in iMovie? From the Apple website I see the interface quite similar to WLMM (with no obvious timeline), but I could be wrong. I do agree however that it should support exporting to more formats, but I guess licensing would be a problem.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/joeale/default.aspx joeale

    So whats going happen with community clips from microsoft office labs.
    Community clip is Powered by Microsoft SoapBox.
    http://communityclips.officelabs.com/

    Microsoft’s MSN To Shut Down YouTube-Rival Soapbox
    Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT), which said last month it was rethinking the strategy around its user-generated video uploading service Soapbox, has decided to shut it down. Microsoft CVP Erik Jorgensen tells us that the company will instead add functionality to its MSN Video site to “enable bloggers and citizen journalists to upload content to share with our MSN users.”

    Soapbox, which Microsoft launched three years ago after making a strategic decision not to purchase a video uploading site, never really caught on. Jorgensen says the service generated less than 5 percent of overall streams on its MSN Video site, where the videos were hosted. Advertisers have also shown a strong preference for placing their ads around professionally created video content, rather than near user-created clips.

    Jorgensen emphasized, however, that MSN remains committed to video, pointing out that MSN Video had its top ever month in the U.S. last year. The company is planning a major overhaul of its MSN portal for later this fall that will focus the site’s content offerings in fewer areas, including news, entertainment, sports, finance, and lifestyle.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/someone/default.aspx someone

    @damaster, iMovie 08 is a dumbed down version going the way of WLMM. iMovie 06 was the last good release.

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/Darks1de/default.aspx Darks1de

    What I want to know is if the old screen / section / app window capture coming back.
    This was great in XP, the ability to capture the whole or just a portion of the screen to make the movie (great for us game developers to show off movies of our games easily).
    But since moving to Windows 7, this isn’t available anymore either under the old movie maker or the new one.
    Have to resort to separate tools, it used to be so much simplier

  • http://www.liveside.net/members/lord_5F00_canti86/default.aspx lord_canti86

    I see that the ribbon interface of WLMM has evolved to the Office 2010 version of the interface.