Windows Live ID to get new sign-in features in Wave 4

As mentioned in our interview with Ryan Gavin and Walter Harp last week, the Windows Live ID team has “some new features coming” that will enhance your protection. We were fortunate enough to get a glimpse of what Windows Live ID will look like in Wave 4. Here it is, a slightly redesigned sign-in page:

Windows Live ID Wave 4

Perhaps on first glimpse, it looks almost the same as the current Windows Live ID sign-in page, this is intended however so users still know they’re on a Windows Live ID sign-in page. What’s new in this release is shown under the menu “Sign-in options” with an option that allow you to select to sign in using a “Single-use Code”:

Single Use Code Single Use Code - Email Single Use Code - Mobile

This new feature of Windows Live ID is designed to further protect users that are signing in from public computers, such as internet cafes, airports, coffee shops…etc. By using a “single-use code”, users won’t have to type in their password on the public computers, preventing your password getting stolen by keyloggers and the like. A user simply needs to press “Request a code”, then either request for the code to be sent via an alternate e-mail address or to their mobile phone via text message (certain regions and countries only). As an added security, this alternative e-mail address or mobile phone number must be the same as the one provided during your Windows Live ID sign-up process (although this can be modified later on), such that an unauthorised person cannot send the “single-use code” to themselves on their own mobile or e-mail address. Even if an unauthorised person gets hold of your phone number or e-mail address, they will not be able to access the “single-use code” that was sent to you.

This is definitely a useful addition to Windows Live ID as people are gradually moving towards the “cloud” for computing, and thus public computer usage is getting more prevalent as users wants to access their e-mails, files, and contacts anywhere and anytime. Good move Microsoft, but where is our OpenID integration?

Update: We almost missed it, thanks to Picturepan2 from LiveSino.net who reminded us that you can also set your Web Messenger sign in status on the Windows Live ID sign-in page (as every Windows Live web service will have Web Messenger built-in) – or you can set it not to sign in to Web Messenger:

Windows Live ID Sign-in

Comments

  • http://reinnovate.wordpress.com/ Kit

    I’m not sure if OpenID is actually that good, it’s quite messy…

    • http://cid-280a1538334a1cb9.profile.live.com/ Seika

      But more sites support it compared to Live ID login.

      • http://www.appatic.com Avatar X

        But it got more users than the MySpace ID or more than even the Yahoo ID or the Twitter ID. So for those reasons i think the Live ID is a valid choice to Facebook Connect and Open ID

        • http://cid-280a1538334a1cb9.profile.live.com/ Seika

          More buts here…
          Even though it has more users, it wouldn’t be so useful if the only place to use it is in Microsoft’s properties (even then, many MSDN blogs still don’t allow commenting with Live ID).

          The places I remember using Live ID for login is only in Get Satisfaction… and Backtype, but they use Clickpass which in turn use OpenID IINM. Commenting here uses Disqus. which support Facebook Connect, Twitter and OpenID, but not Live ID.

          Microsoft should actively help pushing Live ID to more sites (better if it’s popular and high profile sites), although it might cost them time and manpower to help implement Live ID authentication there and maintain it in updates.

  • JohnCz

    Nice shot. Hard not to miss “Windows Live Devices” which I assume is related Live Mesh device ring. I hope their team has more to say about OpenID as well.

  • Bryan

    Looks good, but how about defaulting the sign-in page to “Enhanced Security”–perhaps even get rid of Standard Security altogether? Also, what about CardSpace support?

  • http://www.appatic.com Avatar X

    I seriously expect that the Live ID is made more “Adjustable and Portable” like Facebook Connect and the Twitter ID. Other than that is very good. So i hope Live Wave 4 brings that improvements to the Live ID

    • jkth

      Can you elaborate on what you mean by “adjustable and portable”?

  • technogran

    Yes, I would love Windows Live ID to work in exactly the same way as Facebook Connect. I also wonder what happened to that card idea! LOL. I just hope that they toughen up with who can get a Live ID. At the moment there are far too many users with ‘no name’ getting through…..

    • jkth

      Windows Live ID already supports pretty much the same stuff as Facebook Connect (i.e. allowing you to login to 3rd party websites using your Live ID and then share data with them), the difference is that hardly any 3rd party sites choose to use it.

      Go to http://consent.live.com for proof.

  • ravi16aug

    Sad to see they still cannot manage a high-res icon for Windows Live Id sign-in. The current one with the arrow shows its jagged edges and looks lame. Sure, it does not take away any functionality but really lacks polish.

    • John

      Totally agree.. lol… I also wish they changed the “Windows Live” on the header of all the services pages to a clean logo image instead of plain text.. it would just gives it a more professional look that way… but I’m assuming they put plain text to make it look like pages load faster :P.. but if you look at tons of other web services such as gmail and even Bing, they have the image logo at the top instead of plain text :P… it’s a mini-rant :)

      The new sign-in options look really awesome and is definitely something new to the table :)

      • chris

        I wish Windows live could get a logo too. Perhaps use the same font as bing and the new msn? Fresh logo. No flag.

        • Damaster – LiveSide.net

          “Windows” Live is positioned to be an extended experience for Windows, so i doubt they will get rid of the flag unless they change the whole name and position too. Didn’t bing and msn’s logo got rated the worst logo of the year in 2009? http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/189367.asp Think it was because of its font….

          • JohnCz

            Exactly, its an online extension of Windows. I also see Windows Home Server in the same light.

            Btw, I’m no expert but I think Bing and MSN logo deserve far better ratings.

          • Chris

            I like the font. Fresh, modern and crisp. People just can’t accept change.

    • Chris

      Agreed. The logo for the “passport” needs updating. Been the same since the MSN days

  • Thiago M.

    I’ve once attended a Microsoft speech about security and they have a very interesting position about the subject, differing from the traditional username-password, which is not truly efficient [as they proved in the speech, also quoting Bill's "The password is dead"].

    One of the ideas mentioned in the speech was exactly this single-use password sent to mobile phones. I’m glad to see this finally being implemented.

    However, I am really concerned about the worldwide availability of this feature. I live in Brazil, and so I really suffer to get some Microsoft products and services here. Hope this one reaches our shores.

    Also, OpenID would be very very nice. =)

    • Damaster – LiveSide.net

      Brazil is supported for the mobile phone option. =)