Clarification on Windows Live and XP (just use Wave 3)

The new version of Windows Live, “Wave 4”, which should become available in beta form sometime in June, will not work in XP, and a number of you have commented here and on the Inside Windows Live blog about the lack of XP support.  In reading back through one of the comments on “Getting Ready for Windows Live Wave 4”, we noticed a good explanation for XP support by Windows Live Corporate VP Chris Jones, good enough to share again even though it’s a few weeks old:

Posted on: April 21, 2010 at 2:28PM

Thanks for all the comments on Windows XP support.  We know many customers use Windows XP and are happy with their experience, and of course we will continue to support our current release of Windows Live Essentials on XP and the new versions all of our web-based services (including Hotmail and SkyDrive) will run on XP.  As some have noted on this blog, Windows XP is nearly 10 years old and simply doesn’t provide the same level of platform support for graphics, and we recognized early in our work on Wave 4 that we could do much more in our software on a modern graphics platform.  As a result our new version of Essentials will require the new graphics platform and controls that are only available on Windows 7 or Windows Vista and therefore will only run on these platforms.  So if you are happy with XP, you can keep running the current version of Windows Live and our new services.  When you move to Windows 7 and Windows Vista, we will have a new version that will let you do more on a modern platform.

So, XP users will get all the new stuff from the web services (Hotmail, SkyDrive, etc.), and will be able to continue to use existing Windows Live Essentials (Wave 3) applications.  To get the latest and greatest advances with Windows Live, however, an upgrade to a more modern OS is required.  Fair enough, we think.

Comments

  • http://revanmj.pl/ Michał Jakubowski

    But what with Sync/Mesh? I guess that Live Mesh client we are using now will not work with new version of this service and old Sync client will not support syncing with SkyDrive …

  • James Hammond

    You can at least do something about the tabbed windows for MSN from Wave 4 and import it to XP. that’s a feature that every prior version has lacked up until this point..

  • Martin

    If one is happy with an old OS (i.e. XP), one would certainly be happy with an old version of Windows Live Essentials. Fair enough to me.

  • anonymous

    I can understand about Photo Gallery and Movie Maker but I don’t understand why Live Mail, Messenger, Writer, Family Safety and Sync require cutting edge graphics support. In fact Outlook 2010 runs on XP but not Live Mail, Communicator 2010 will run but not WL Messenger, Word 2010 will run but not Live Writer? Too bad Microsoft we can see though your business decision in spite of XP having 60% market share. There’s always Picasa which is more full-featured overall than Photo Gallery. And Gmail+Talk, Yahoo! Messenger and the excellent free Zimbra Desktop for email. Third parties will always support XP as long as it’s in use and for much much longer.

    • anonymous

      Think about the average end user. Why would they fragment the suite & force people to install half the apps from one version & the other half from another?

      • Chris

        Exactly. Plus the new ribbion UI uses a framework and code not found in Windows XP.

      • anonymous

        Live Movie Maker doesn’t run on XP right now but Wave 3 installs. It wouldn’t matter as components that won’t install don’t appear at all. Of course, they use the Windows Ribbon APIs currently so no apps will run on XP but they could have very well used the Office Ribbon APIs. In fact the 2010 Ribbon is an improved iteration that’s customizable and looks better. Users aren’t fools to believe their “graphics capabilities not in XP” justification is true. This is a business decision, might as well call it that.

  • http://kantong.net Kantong

    The Office platform is used in corporate environments, most of which still use XP. So I can see the need for them to continuing to support XP with Office, however most people (that I know) have moved off XP onto 7 for their home computers.

    • Chris

      I tested vista since the early beta days. So I really been using vista since 2005/2006. Havin’t used XP since

    • jtmat

      All corporate and gov’t I deal with don’t allow live… you have stuff like groove, etc that some play with… but most of live activities are blocked. Of course, I don’t deal with all… just stating what I’m seeing and experiencing. Most are moving to Windows 7. I’m testing for three places… two skipped vista, one skipped vista until vista sp2. I perform some testing in xp for apps, but most testing is needed for win 7 (legacy stuff). So far win 7 is working fine…