Yahoo! Messenger discontinues interoperability with Windows Live Messenger

By damaster | Posted December 1, 2012 18 comments

Windows Live and Yahoo MessengerSix-and-a-half years ago in June 2006, we first reported that Microsoft and Yahoo! have reached an agreement to provide interoperability between their two IM services – Windows Live Messenger, which was still in beta form at that time, and Yahoo! Messenger. This was from their press release at the time:

Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: “YHOO”) and Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: “MSFT”) today will begin limited public beta testing of interoperability between their instant messaging (IM) services that enable users of Windows Live® Messenger, the next generation of MSN® Messenger, and Yahoo!® Messenger with Voice to connect with each other. This interoperability — the first of its kind between two distinct, global consumer IM providers — will form the world’s largest consumer IM community, approaching 350 million accounts.

Consumers worldwide from Microsoft and Yahoo! will be able to take advantage of IM interoperability and join the limited public beta program. They will be among the first to exchange instant messages across the free services as well as see their friends’ online presence, view personal status messages, share select emoticons, view offline messages and add new contacts from either service at no cost. Yahoo! and Microsoft plan to make the interoperability between their respective IM services broadly available to consumers in the coming months.

The interoperability had lived on since the many revisions and version changes for both Messenger services – until this month. Today, Yahoo! announced on their official blog post that support for the interoperability between Yahoo! Messenger and Windows Live Messenger will be discontinued from December 14, 2012. Here’s a quote from the post:

Yahoo! Messenger will no longer be interoperable with Microsoft Windows Live Messenger as of December 14, 2012. Microsoft buddies will still appear on your Messenger contact list, but they will be greyed out, and if you try to send instant messages to them, the messages will not be delivered.

This comes as Microsoft is in the process of retiring its Windows Live Messenger client, and transitioning all their users to Skype by 1Q 2013 (whilst retaining the Messenger backend however for Skype IMs). The Messenger API on Live Connect, with support for XMPP and MSP protocols, is also expected to be decommissioned in October 2013 and March 2014 respectively, with developers being directed to the Skype Developer website when visiting the Messenger section on Live Connect.

Whilst we can’t say we have used the interoperability that much to contact our friends on Yahoo! Messenger in the past few years, but we’re definitely sad to see this go as Microsoft winds down Windows Live Messenger.

Posted December 1st, 2012 at 5:14 pm
  • http://twitter.com/surilamin surilamin

    You really have to ask your yourself who is still using Yahoo Messenger. Between Skype and Facebook I think most people are covered.

    • http://twitter.com/bart_willeman Bart Willeman

      Couldnt agree more. And with these two network being able to communicate, all is good in the IM-world :)

  • http://twitter.com/surilamin surilamin

    You really have to ask your yourself who is still using Yahoo Messenger. Between Skype and Facebook I think most people are covered.

    • http://twitter.com/bart_willeman Bart Willeman

      Couldnt agree more. And with these two network being able to communicate, all is good in the IM-world :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/SethThomas98 Seth Thomas

    MSNP protocols. MSP was a gateway service.

  • seth thomas

    MSNP protocols. MSP was a gateway service.

  • http://twitter.com/Mariohenri90 Henri Loitiere

    Good bye custom msn emotes…..I’ve been using for the past 6 years…

  • http://twitter.com/Mariohenri90 Henri Loitiere

    Good bye custom msn emotes…..I’ve been using for the past 6 years…

  • http://www.techmansworld.com/ Michael Hazell

    I’m not sure if many used this feature, but I guess the feature is too late to cash in on.

  • http://www.techmansworld.com/ Michael Hazell

    I’m not sure if many used this feature, but I guess the feature is too late to cash in on.

  • papula

    We are all using tango

  • papula

    We are all using tango

  • V Cordes

    This feature never really worked smoothly anyway, when on yahoo and chatting with MSN contacts, the MSN contacts would randomly stop recieving your messages. Glad to know Yahoo is still there, cause I’m returning to it. I refuse to use skype.

  • Vanessa

    This feature never really worked smoothly anyway, when on yahoo and chatting with MSN contacts, the MSN contacts would randomly stop recieving your messages. Glad to know Yahoo is still there, cause I’m returning to it. I refuse to use skype.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UP6EATAV7R3JJGXSQ776PKSYLQ Mintee

    I like live open chat to chat with anyone anywhere in the world.. skype is limited to just who you know, so is facebook..

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UP6EATAV7R3JJGXSQ776PKSYLQ Mintee

    I like live open chat to chat with anyone anywhere in the world.. skype is limited to just who you know, so is facebook..

  • TymonTheThief

    As I wrote on other websites regarding microsoft ending windows live messenger. This was quite possibly the most moronic decision they could have possibly made. Let’s compare what MSN had that skype does not… MSN had the ability to leave offline messages to people. Skype does not. If you leave a message to someone, it will only be delivered when you are BOTH next online at the same time. This can mean Goodnights, or goodbyes, are delivered days later as the introduction of the meeting. MSN has photo sharing, allowing you to give a sort of slideshow of pictures to people instead of sending them as files. MSN also has nudges, winks, and custom emoticons. Furthermore, MSN actually had FREE SMS messaging functions. Skype may be far superior as a video or voice calling platform, but as an actual messenger it absolutely sucks in comparison. And I want a messenger, not a voice call or video call platform.

  • TymonTheThief

    As I wrote on other websites regarding microsoft ending windows live messenger. This was quite possibly the most moronic decision they could have possibly made. Let’s compare what MSN had that skype does not… MSN had the ability to leave offline messages to people. Skype does not. If you leave a message to someone, it will only be delivered when you are BOTH next online at the same time. This can mean Goodnights, or goodbyes, are delivered days later as the introduction of the meeting. MSN has photo sharing, allowing you to give a sort of slideshow of pictures to people instead of sending them as files. MSN also has nudges, winks, and custom emoticons. Furthermore, MSN actually had FREE SMS messaging functions. Skype may be far superior as a video or voice calling platform, but as an actual messenger it absolutely sucks in comparison. And I want a messenger, not a voice call or video call platform.