Join LiveSide!
Sign In using: Name/Password OpenID
or Live ID: Sign In Live ID
0 out of 8,431 members
are online, & 76 guest(s).

Recent Comments

–krabagobanjo
re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says

–webdesignchick
re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says

–fredacosta
re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says

–ChaosAngelic
re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says

Log in or Join to leave a comment!

PDC Liveblog!

Join us next week as we liveblog the PDC keynotes!
More info soon!

 

LiveSide on Mobile

Our latest posts and our favorite links,
all on your phone or mobile device
Visit m.LiveSide.net
Or go to www.LiveSide.net
on your mobile device and we'll redirect you!

Tweets We Like

Loading...

LiveSide Time

Redmond

Dallas (server)

London

Shanghai

Windows Live Calendar

PDC LA Nov 17-19

   www.microsoftpdc.com

Follow us on Facebook

    LiveSide.net
   
    Promote Your Page Too

  • LiveSide on the Windows Live Network
  • LiveSide on Facebook
  • LiveSide on Twitter
  • LiveSide RSS  
  • Windows Live Alerts
  •  
  • feedburner
  •  
LiveSide - News blog

“Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says

After more than a week of silence on what caused the Sidekick outage with Danger, the Los Angeles Times today quotes Microsoft spokesperson Tonya Klause, not really explaining what happened, but definitely distancing Microsoft cloud services such as Windows Live and Azure from the Danger platform:

“The Danger Service platform, which experienced the outage, is a standalone service operating on non-Microsoft technologies, and is not related to Microsoft’s cloud services platform or Windows Live," Microsoft spokesperson Tonya Klause wrote in an e-mail. “Other and future Microsoft mobile products and services are entirely based on Microsoft technologies and Microsoft’s cloud service platform and software."

and:

Microsoft drew a further distinction between Danger and its other data assets, saying that "it’s important to note that for native Microsoft services such as Windows Live, Hotmail, Azure, etc., we write multiple replicas of user data to multiple devices so that the data is available in a situation where a single or multiple physical nodes may fail," Klause wrote.

Still no word on what caused the loss of data (which may not be a total loss after all, not much news on that either), although there has been speculation that the failure happened in an attempt to move the open source Danger platform to Microsoft technologies.  Microsoft still needs to come clean on exactly what happened, and why, in our opinion.

Comments

ChaosAngelic wrote re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 7:02 AM

Maybe so, but you just know all the anti-Microsoft people will keep on whining.

fredacosta wrote re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 11:06 AM

Agree with ChaosAngelic.  However, it would be nice to know exactly what happened so that we can let this die already.  Cnet seems to post up to 4 stories daily just to get comments, and the MS hating crowd riled up.  It's a shame.  I hope they work this out.

webdesignchick wrote re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 1:27 PM

@ chaos

why be sarcastic, when macs just work better. example #1: Vista.

krabagobanjo wrote re: “Non-Microsoft technologies” to blame for Danger/Sidekick failure, Microsoft says
on Thu, Oct 15 2009 4:16 PM

@ webdesignchick

Please don't start a flame war.  We don't need it.  Besides, my Win7 PC works best for ME.  Use what's best for you.

Sign In Live ID using Live ID, Name/Password, or OpenID
or Join LiveSide to leave a comment!