<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.liveside.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Yahoo! responds to Ballmer, believes offer is too low</title><link>http://www.liveside.net/main/archive/2008/04/07/yahoo-responds-to-ballmer-believes-offer-is-too-low.aspx</link><description>In response to a letter to the Yahoo! Board of Directors on Saturday, Jerry Yang and the Board responded this morning with a letter of their own , again rejecting the Microsoft offer as too low, although stating publicly for the first time that Yahoo</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Yahoo! responds to Ballmer, believes offer is too low</title><link>http://www.liveside.net/main/archive/2008/04/07/yahoo-responds-to-ballmer-believes-offer-is-too-low.aspx#7816</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:52:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">56c526a3-1f9b-4262-a0cc-2de2ce4c7619:7816</guid><dc:creator>oli.burgess</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say, I agree with Yahoo!. It has a strong foothold in the asian markets, its website is the no. 1 visited in the world, and it has good advertising and mobile internet technologies. I don't think that because its search share is declining that its prospects are non-existent. It is now up to Ballmer to sweeten the bid so that the takeover is peaceful and executed soon. (BTW don't you think he looks like Freddy Krueger from Nightmare on Elm Street?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.liveside.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>