http://www.liveside.net/main/archive/2008/04/08/microsoft-and-yahoo-sites-compared-a-quick-look-at-the-numbers.aspxWith all the talk about Microsoft&#39;s attempted acquisition of Yahoo!, and with a little help from Nielsen Online , we thought we&#39;d make a quick comparison of some of the main features of both services.&#160; I asked Nielsen if they could supplyenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://www.liveside.net/main/archive/2008/04/08/microsoft-and-yahoo-sites-compared-a-quick-look-at-the-numbers.aspx#7830Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:16:09 GMT56c526a3-1f9b-4262-a0cc-2de2ce4c7619:7830tophtucker<p>I agree, quikboy--they may be U.S.-only numbers.</p> <p>It would also be interesting to throw Google and AOL in there.</p> <p>But thanks Kip, that's interesting.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.liveside.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7830" width="1" height="1">http://www.liveside.net/main/archive/2008/04/08/microsoft-and-yahoo-sites-compared-a-quick-look-at-the-numbers.aspx#7828Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:57:42 GMT56c526a3-1f9b-4262-a0cc-2de2ce4c7619:7828quikboy<p>I'm kinda surprised. </p> <p>I would have assumed WLM is more popular, since people outside of the US (yeah, I know this data is US-only) tend to use WLM a lot. </p> <p>And with more people using WLM, I thought that would also mean more people using Live Hotmail. </p> <p>I'm also puzzled why anyone actually uses Y! search. Google search I understand, but what the heck does Y! have that's so good? I tried it, and I think it's worse than the other two. </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.liveside.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7828" width="1" height="1">