Home Interviews Developers Our View Forums Blogs We Like The List

Featured Article:

Microsoft discontinues Windows Live OneCare – offers lightweight alternative for free

Microsoft just announced that it is discontinuing Windows Live OneCare from 2009, replacing it with a free lightweight alternative, codenamed “Morro”.  The new product will be available towards the end of 2009, and provide complete malware protection to consumers, at no cost. This is in contrast to Windows Live Onecare, which currently offers malware protection, backup, online photo backup, multiple machine monitoring and a firewall. However these features come with a price tag of around $30 for 3 machines. Windows Live OneCare subscriptions will stop being sold via retail channels from 30
by Chris on 18 Nov 2008, 09:36 PM with 19 comment(s) and 1,601 views

June 2008 - OurView: The Opinion Blog

Did Microsoft play Yahoo! like a violin?

by Kip Kniskern on 13 Jun 2008, 08:50 PM with 5 comment(s) and 1,835 views

While we stopped writing about the day to day exploits of Microsoft and Yahoo! a bit ago, now that it appears to be coming to an end we can’t help but make a few observations.  When Microsoft first approached Yahoo! about some kind of deal, back in January 2007, the idea of a rapid advance in search share seemed obvious and advantageous.  Since then, Microsoft both wearied of dealing with Yahoo! and probably learned quite a bit about the motivations, and the weaknesses of the company it pursued.  From the moment Microsoft made a public offer for Yahoo!, on February 1 of this year, nothing about the way that Yahoo! responded could have come as much of a surprise to Microsoft.  They’d been witnessing the same kind of action for more than a year behind closed doors.

Make no mistake, finding weaknesses, and then going for the throat, is what Microsoft does best.  As an evil empire, they’re damn good at what they do.

So take a look at what’s transpired since February.  Yahoo! is a shambles.  Microsoft has begun to fire the first volleys in its assault on “the ten blue lines”, with a stated purpose of “disrupting” in search.  Google finds itself, while decidedly in a strengthened position, all of a sudden with the eyes of the Department of Justice upon them.

Jerry Yang and David Filo were shocked when Microsoft pulled back from the table, but was it an admission of defeat by Microsoft, or a calculated move to “disrupt” in a lot more ways than just rolling out a cashback program?  Did Microsoft lead Yahoo! up to the precipice and then give them a swift kick in the behind?  Microsoft walked away from the deal, and truthfully if anything it was a relief to shareholders, partners, and employees.  They came out of it with no damage done.  If they could have pulled off a deal that made sense, at a price that made sense, they would have done so.  By pulling out, they may have dealt a fatal blow to Yahoo!, set Google up for a monopoly battle that might, with any luck, get ugly quickly, and certainly have left the search game with more uncertainty (and more opportunity for Microsoft) than there was before the offer was made.

Over and over, word from within Microsoft is that “we’re in search for the long haul”, and “this game is just beginning”.  Microsoft isn’t going to win in search this year, or next.  Beating Yahoo! down isn’t going to guarantee Microsoft anything, and may indeed make Google even more powerful than before.  But it’s a shot, an opening that wasn’t there before.  Will the disruption they’ve caused by pursuing, and then spurning Yahoo! reveal some chinks in the Google armor?  Will Google be ready to withstand an assault by the DOJ, with Microsoft pulling every string they have available behind the scenes to spur them on? Expect Microsoft to be more than ready to exploit every weakness, to get down and dirty, to pull out its formidable bag of tricks.  Microsoft didn’t lose much by not buying Yahoo!, but what did they gain?  Time will tell. 

Filed under: ,

Does Microsoft need a new search brand?

by Kip Kniskern on 05 Jun 2008, 09:44 AM with 3 comment(s) and 3,091 views

Last fall, some of our sources hinted at an upcoming rebranding effort for Live Search, code named “Rome”.  That renaming effort, seemingly thwarted by all the buzz around Yahoo!, never took place (or at least hasn’t so far).  Yet talk continues to swirl around rebranding Live Search, even including some strong hints by Microsoft Online Services President Kevin Johnson, both at Advance08, and again yesterday at SMX Advanced.

Does Live Search need rebranding?  First of all, what is a brand?  Of course a brand is much more than a catchy new name.  A brand is a conversation, the new thinking goes.  More than just a name and a logo, a brand carries emotional attachment.  In a Wikipedia entry on “Brand”, the authors quote Howard Shultz, CEO of Starbucks coffee:

"A great brand raises the bar -- it adds a greater sense of purpose to the experience, whether it's the challenge to do your best in sports and fitness, or the affirmation that the cup of coffee you're drinking really matters."

In a post on Nielsen NetRatings Small Business Professional Center blog, Matt Alderton quotes author Barbara Findley Schenk on brands:

branding is part cosmetic—a name, a logo, and a slogan on your business cards—but more than that, it's a promise that your customers believe in. "If you can't make and keep a promise," she says, "then all the marketing and advertising materials in the world won't work."

Filed under: ,
Powered By Community Server Themed By nb development
Copyright © 2006-2008 LiveSide All Rights Reserved
Microsoft, Microsoft logos, Windows and Windows Live are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.