Join LiveSide!
Sign In using: Name/Password OpenID
or Live ID: Sign In Live ID
0 out of 8,042 members
are online, & 45 guest(s).

Recent Comments



–surilamin
re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?


Log in or Join to leave a comment!

LiveSide on Mobile

Our latest posts and our favorite links,
all on your phone or mobile device
Visit m.LiveSide.net
Or go to www.LiveSide.net
on your mobile device and we'll redirect you!

Tweets We Like

Loading...

LiveSide Time

Redmond

Dallas (server)

London

Shanghai

Windows Live Calendar

PDC LA Nov 17-19

   www.microsoftpdc.com

Follow us on Facebook

    LiveSide.net
   
    Promote Your Page Too

  • LiveSide on the Windows Live Network
  • LiveSide on Facebook
  • LiveSide on Twitter
  • LiveSide RSS  
  • Windows Live Alerts
  •  
  • feedburner
  •  
OurView: The Opinion Blog

OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?

Microsoft announced today that after June 30, 2009, Windows Live OneCare will be shut down, and that Microsoft is working on a new, free, small footprint anti-virus solution code-named “Morro”.  Ina Fried at CNET News and others have been playing this as somewhat of a bold move by Microsoft, to somehow disrupt the market held by Symantec and McAfee by offering a free AV solution.

I’m not so sure.  From here, this looks much more like spin on the failure of OneCare.  Regardless of what Morro becomes, and more about that in a bit,  OneCare hasn’t had the impact that Microsoft had hoped.  While Microsoft touts OneCare’s “award winning” status, it also garnered some embarrassing negative press, and certainly wasn’t or isn’t held in high regard as a leader in anti-virus software (or a leader in sales, for that matter).

Early on, OneCare succumbed to the kind of bloatware that had made other security suites almost unusable, bundling in printer sharing, online backup, tune-up automation, and other fluff that seemed designed as much to hide the core software’s shortcomings as to add value.  Indeed, today’s press release seems to try and distance itself from these “additional non-security features” as it sets up Morro to be something different:

By shifting to focus on the core anti-malware features that most consumers still don’t keep up to date, “Morro” will be able to provide the essential protections that consumers need without overusing system resources, and will help more consumers have better protection against online threats.

While Microsoft could have just kept on plugging away with OneCare, this was a product going decidedly in the wrong direction.  Windows Live OneCare painted itself into a corner in at least three areas:

  1. One of the biggest feature requests for Windows 7 and beyond is for quicker startup and shutdown times.  By loading OneCare up with “additional non-security features”, OneCare at least incrementally slowed the system down at startup and shutdown.  Rather than continue down a path of fighting against itself, Microsoft has chosen to change course.  With Morro, it is pursuing a solution that “will be architected for a smaller footprint that will use fewer computing resources”.  And ensure, presumably, faster loading home PCs.

  2. Scale.  In order to effectively gather information about virus threats, the larger the install base the better.  A Morro solution, with a small footprint and a hopefully much larger install base, will be better able to collect information on, and then stop, more malware.  Microsoft is continuing to pursue for-profit solutions like Forefront, which will share the malware protection engine with Morro, remember.

  3. Online backup.  In a nutshell, OneCare online backup is at odds with SkyDrive, Live Sync (and the coming meshification of Windows Live), and Windows Live.  Continuing to offer disparate backup solutions hasn’t made much sense all along, and now that SkyDrive is offering 25gb of free storage, paying $50/yr for 50gb needed to go.  Pulling it, however, would have made OneCare a less compelling product.  A rock, as it were, and a hard place.

If Microsoft had succeeded with OneCare, it wouldn’t be pulling the plug now, regardless of the above discretions.  But OneCare hasn’t succeeded, and today’s announcement is more about terminating OneCare than it is about Morro, regardless of the spin.  And it remains to be seen whether running a less than stellar anti-malware engine as a free standalone will fare any better.

Not that Morro doesn’t present some compelling possibilities.  For one thing, OneCare’s failure may be more about the failure of the anti-malware suite in general than of any particular OneCare shortcomings.  Slow to load, hard to maintain, and a hard sell to consumers for any price other than “free with a rebate”, anti-malware programs aren’t a great consumer business to be in.  By offering a free, small footprint, no frills alternative, Microsoft gets out of a bad business, speeds up Windows, helps work on the malware problem (which MS rightly maintains is beginning to get real ugly, especially in emerging markets), and may help to position Windows Live as an answer to some of the “additional features” that OneCare tried to provide.

Still, we’re kind of sad to see OneCare go.  Less obtrusive than most, cute and almost pretty, OneCare seemed to try and do a good job, and not get too much in the way.  Here’s hoping Morro meets a better fate.

Comments

tophtucker wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 12:36 AM

I've been a happy OneCare user for some time now. Alas. :(

"(and the coming meshification of Windows Live)"

Will such a wonderous thing ever come to pass????

Khristopher wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 1:24 AM

I think it should never have been a Windows Live product in the first place. Windows product, sure, but not Windows Live.

I also think malware protection should be offered free in the first place.

avatar wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 3:44 AM

I disagree on your view of it Kip. it didn`t failed. it progressed in the anti-virus and security suite reports as it evolved. last version ended up in third place from a consumer standpoint and like 5 from general standpoint ( regular, premium). it also had the best price and the easiest ease of use. i say it as someone who has dealed with lots of security suites.  it didn`t had great sales but it was doing OK and it was meant as a work in progress.  but i do see your points. what i think is that they caved in to the heat and the pressure the development of OneCare brought.  but Morro may be the payback. they still releasing a anti-virus/anti-spyware/anti-adware in one single utility and for free. and since it don`t comes bundled. it could still cannabalize the competition for regular security suites. i mean 2.5 anti-virus module was able to beat even Nod32. at the pace they were evolving. i am sure 3.0 would have been pretty much put OneCare at the Top of the game. but it is indeed sad that it didn`t got more marketshare. it did had something realy bad. if you had  a bad/damaged,modified XP install. i would bully the pc up to version 2.0. this is something that only got resolved until 2.5. this is usually the cause of the flak it took and that made many to proclaim it sucked. for me the only version that were lacklusters were pre 1.0 and 1.0 final. 1.5 was nice, 2.0 was good, 2.5 is great.

avatar wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 3:45 AM

but i do must confess that i got it for free when it came to my use until 2.5. 2.5 is the only version i paid for my use since i was a beta tester for it the whole way to now. but i did sold it to others and it was a success.

quikboy wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 5:55 AM

OneCare dying is pretty sad. I've heard of positive things before, like the ease of use, the PC hub, and all that, though I already had a subscription anti-virus that still hasn't ended its term yet.

I also liked the OneCare name. It just sounded kinda cool to me, and more original than something like Windows Live Photo Gallery. 'Morro' doesn't like a good name though. Anyone agree?

Well I hope Morro does at least the main thing that most security suites do : Protect users from threats that can hurt their OS.

I guess OneCare wasn't a quick seller also because some people thought it was Microsoft's way of pumping you for money when MS should have integrated this better security into Windows in the first place. Couldn't Microsoft just have OneCare functionality built into Windows, without calling it antivirus? Just say that it's a feature and you can still install any other security suite and disable the ones built into Windows, just like any other application.

Tony T wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 6:45 AM

I've been  happy One Care user since the beginning. Yeah, it sure does slow down startup sometimes, but I really like it.

cJr wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 9:15 AM

@quikboy:

'Morro' isn't the final name of the product (yet). It is just a codename, so it is likely to change.

surilamin wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 9:38 AM

Microsoft generally take three or four revisions of a product to get something right.  Case and point, Wave 3 (I think we all agree the Live services vision hasn't really come together until now).

Many of us saw the potential Onecare had with version 2.5 and it could have been a great product.

I hope Morro turn out to be a killer, and that they have learned from what they did with Onecare.

cJr wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Wed, Nov 19 2008 8:14 PM

@surilamin:

I agree with your point there. Windows Live Wave 3 does seem to be the vision Windows Live was supposed to be.

It's still a shame that there are a few things they didn't pick up on though, like being able to select different colours as well as themes (a very stupid move in my opinion as some of us like to have the default design, but different colours, keeping it more porfessional for us) and they also haven't seemed to put new favicons in their code.

Some Windows Live websites don't have favicons, some have horrible old ones (e.g. Hotmail has that horrible embossed logo favicon which looks horrible sometimes, compared to the Live Search one which is used on some Windows Live websites).

Microsoft have been getting better at consistency between services, but there is still a long way to go and I don't understand how no-body in the company has noticed these inconsistencies. They can be spotted very easily. Most of them I spotted straight away!

kev wrote re: OneCare and Morro: New Direction, or Fail?
on Sun, Nov 23 2008 12:25 AM

Morro is a clever, long overdue, move by Microsoft to neutralize adverse internet security arguments once and for all, about the extra costs associated with using the windows os as compared to linux/unix/mac systems while perhaps going some way to curbing the growth of linux in the 3rd world.

Microsoft has realized that  the windows 'customer experience' is primarily in their hands and it cannot be left to 3rd party vendors, as they seem to have done to their detriment, in the past.

Sign In Live ID using Live ID, Name/Password, or OpenID
or Join LiveSide to leave a comment!