<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.liveside.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mr. Softie goes online - will "strong arm" business tactics work with Web 2.0?</title><link>http://www.liveside.net/opinion/archive/2008/01/20/mr-softie-goes-online-will-quot-strong-arm-quot-business-tactics-work-with-web-2-0.aspx</link><description>Fortune Magazine&amp;#39;s blog post &amp;quot; The hard side of Mr. Softie &amp;quot;, where some old school strong arm tactics are ascribed to Microsoft in trying to get startup&amp;#160; Web 2.0 companies to use Windows Live Messenger is interesting in a couple of</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Mr. Softie goes online - will "strong arm" business tactics work with Web 2.0?</title><link>http://www.liveside.net/opinion/archive/2008/01/20/mr-softie-goes-online-will-quot-strong-arm-quot-business-tactics-work-with-web-2-0.aspx#7131</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">56c526a3-1f9b-4262-a0cc-2de2ce4c7619:7131</guid><dc:creator>Mephiles</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone noticed the strange behaviour of the live.com page?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.liveside.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7131" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>